Algorithmic Correspondence and Completeness in Modal Logic. II. Polyadic and Hybrid Extensions of the Algorithm SQEMA
نویسندگان
چکیده
In Conradie, Goranko, and Vakarelov (2006, Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2) we introduced a new algorithm, SQEMA, for computing first-order equivalents and proving the canonicity of modal formulae of the basic modal language. Here we extend SQEMA, first to arbitrary and reversive polyadic modal languages, and then to hybrid polyadic languages too. We present the algorithm, illustrate it with some examples, and prove its correctness with respect to local equivalence of the input and output formulae, its completeness with respect to the polyadic inductive formulae introduced in Goranko and Vakarelov (2001, J. Logic. Comput., 11, 737–754) and Goranko and Vakarelov (2006, Ann. Pure. Appl. Logic, 141, 180–217), and the d-persistence (with respect to descriptive frames) of the formulae on which the algorithm succeeds. These results readily expand to completeness with respect to hybrid inductive polyadic formulae and di-persistence (with respect to discrete frames) in hybrid reversive polyadic languages.
منابع مشابه
Algorithmic Correspondence and Completeness in Modal Logic. III. Extensions of the Algorithm SQEMA with Substitutions
In earlier papers we have introduced an algorithm, SQEMA, for computing first-order equivalents and proving canonicity of modal formulae. However, SQEMA is not complete with respect to the so called complex Sahlqvist formulae. In this paper we, first, introduce the class of complex inductive formulae, which extends both the class of complex Sahlqvist formulae and the class of polyadic inductive...
متن کاملAlgorithmic correspondence and completeness in modal logic
This thesis takes an algorithmic perspective on the correspondence between modal and hybrid logics on the one hand, and first-order logic on the other. The canonicity of formulae, and by implication the completeness of logics, is simultaneously treated. Modal formulae define second-order conditions on frames which, in some cases, are equivalently reducible to first-order conditions. Modal formu...
متن کاملAlgorithmic correspondence and completeness in modal logic. V. Recursive extensions of SQEMA
The previously introduced algorithm SQEMA computes first-order frame equivalents for modal formulae and also proves their canonicity. Here we extend SQEMA with an additional rule based on a recursive version of Ackermann’s lemma, which enables the algorithm to compute local frame equivalents of modal formulae in the extension of first-order logic with monadic least fixed-points FOμ. This comput...
متن کاملAlgorithmic correspondence and completeness in modal logic. I. The core algorithm SQEMA
Modal formulae express monadic second-order properties on Kripke frames, but in many important cases these have rst-order equivalents. Computing such equivalents is important for both logical and computational reasons. On the other hand, canonicity of modal formulae is important, too, because it implies frame-completeness of logics axiomatized with canonical formulae. Computing a rst-order equi...
متن کاملAlgorithmic Correspondence and Canonicity for Possibility Semantics (Abstract)
Unified Correspondence. Correspondence and completeness theory have a long history in modal logic, and they are referred to as the “three pillars of wisdom supporting the edifice of modal logic” [22, page 331] together with duality theory. Dating back to [20,21], the Sahlqvist theorem gives a syntactic definition of a class of modal formulas, the Sahlqvist class, each member of which defines an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- J. Log. Comput.
دوره 16 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006